|
High Court Decision: Keelgrove Properties Ltd.
v Shelbourne Development Ltd.
On 8th July, 2005 Mr. Justice Paul Gilligan declared Keelgrove
Properties Limited to be the lawful owner of a site in central Dublin
on the Moore Street side of a substantial development. The dispute
between Keelgrove Properties Limited and Shelbourne Development
Limited related to ownership of a plot of ground at Moore Street,
Dublin, referred to in Court during the hearing of the matter as
a "tooth" missing from a commercial building built by Shelbourne
on a site bounded by Moore Street, Parnell Street, Moore Lane and
O'Rahilly Parade.
In 1997, Keelgrove and Shelbourne were both attempting to put together
a development site by buying up a large number of small sites and
dilapidated buildings. Both had attempted to buy No. 30 Moore Street,
which had been a poulterer's shop until 1986 but which was, by then,
a vacant site. Shelbourne, having failed to buy the land, later
disputed Keelgrove's legal title and asserted that it had acquired
title by adverse possession.
In 2003 Keelgrove instructed LK Shields Solicitors (Edmund
Butler, Partner and Jennifer
Clarke, Associate Solicitor) to commence High Court proceedings
to establish its legal ownership of the land. While the action was
pending, Shelbourne built around the disputed site leaving what
was variously referred to as the "tooth" and a "very tall hand-ball
alley" in the side of the building.
At the commencement of the hearing on 22nd June last Mr. Senan
Allen S.C. for Keelgrove, told the Court that Shelbourne now admitted
Keelgrove's title to the site but sought to establish that it and
its predecessors in title had been in adverse possession.
Mr. Dan Sullivan of Springfield Road, Templeogue, Dublin 6W, told
Counsel for Shelbourne, that after the shop was demolished by Dublin
Corporation he had used the site for parking cars but that he had
the permission of the then owner, a Mr. Brazil, to do so. In an
Affidavit filed some time ago Mr. Sullivan had been unable to recall
that in 1989 he had signed an acknowledgement that he had no claim
over the property but in evidence, on the 22nd June, 2005, he remembered
signing the acknowledgment.
Mr. Frank Kinsella, who managed a car park on behalf of Shelbourne
from 1997 until 2003, did not dispute that a trailer which had been
parked on the disputed site had been moved at the request of Keelgrove
and said that, on the instructions of Shelbourne, he had cordoned
of the "tooth area" with a ribbon and prevented cars from being
parked on it. Following legal submissions on 23rd June 2005 as to
the legal consequences of the history of the disputed site, Mr.
Justice Gilligan said that he would reserve judgment.
On 8th July, 2005 when delivering his judgment Mr. Justice Gilligan
stated inter alia that there was no question of Mr. Sullivan's usage
of Number 30 from 1989 through to 1997 being "adverse possession"
and declared that Keelgrove was the lawful owner. Mr. Justice Gilligan
also made an order of costs in favour of Keelgrove.
14th July 2005.
© 2003-2009 LK Shields Solicitors.
All rights reserved.
|