|
Filing obligations under The Company Law Enforcement Act 2001
Company law enforcement has a new face and a new regime, with the
appointment of Paul Appleby as the Director of Corporate Enforcement
and the enactment of the Company Law Enforcement Act, 2001 (CLEA).
Part 6 of the Act contains provisions expressly designed to improve
compliance with filing annual returns and accounts.
The Act contains express provisions for imposing different fees
for documents dependant on when they are filed. From 1 January,
a filing fee of €30 applies to an annual return filed with accounts.
The accounts that are attached to the annual return should not be
more than nine months old. The penalty for filing late is €100 plus
€3 per day thereafter.
Under the current regime, 77 days are allowed for delivery of
the annual return to the Companies Registration Office; on day 78,
the filing penalty becomes due. The new Act changes this and with
effect from 1 March 2002, an annual return date (ARD) will be introduced
for each company. The ARD is a specific date in every year to which
a company will be obliged to make up its annual return.
After 1 March 2002, a company must file its annual return with
accounts no later than 28 days after the date to which the annual
return has been made up to. The ARD will be determined by reference
to the anniversary of the company's most recent annual return date.
Where a company has not filed an annual return and it is in existence
prior to 1 March 2002, the ARD will be six months after the anniversary
of incorporation.
The ARD for a company incorporated after 1 March 2002 will also
be six months after the anniversary of incorporation, but no accounts
will have to be annexed to this particular annual return.
A company will be able to extend its ARD by up to six months on
any one occasion during the first 12 months after the commencement
of the relevant section of the Company Law Enforcement Act, 2001
on 1 March 2002. The optimum ARD dates for companies will, of course,
be nine months after the year-end of the company.
In support of the new filing requirements and penalties referred
to above, the Registrar of Companies has been granted greater powers.
The Company Law Enforcement Act, 2001 provides that a certificate
from the Registrar detailing the facts as to filing or non-filing
will be admissible in court as proof. In addition, where the Registrar
has reasonable grounds for believing that a person is in default
of filing an annual return or similar document required under the
Companies Acts, he may serve a notice on the company or its officers.
The notice will request them to remedy the default and pay a prescribed
amount. If this is done during the period specified in the notice,
then prosecution of the person to whom the notice is delivered will
not be instituted.
The Company Law Enforcement Act, 2001 has also increased the maximum
fine for all summary offences under the Companies Acts to €1,905
and the term of imprisonment on conviction on indictment has been
increased to five years. In addition, where the Companies Acts provide
that an officer of a company is in default and shall be liable to
a fine or penalty, the officer shall be presumed to have permitted
a default by the company unless he can establish that he took all
reasonable steps to prevent it.
In summary, the Company Law Enforcement Act, 2001 aims to impose
much stricter compliance requirements on the filing obligations
of companies and has given the Director of Corporate Enforcement
considerable powers to ensure that company law compliance is strictly
adhered to. Companies and their officers will therefore need to
be far more vigilant about Companies Registration Office filings
if they are not to incur penalties and prosecution.
Spring 2002.
For further information please contact Alan
Browning.
© 2003-2006 LK Shields Solicitors.
All rights reserved.
|