|
Knee-jerk Reaction or Reasoned Response?
Fund managers working with alternative investment
funds believe that they have been unfairly targeted by a draft EU
Directive for a financial crisis that was not of their making. Damien
Barnaville discusses.
On 30 April, the European Commission published a draft Directive
on Alternative Investment Fund Managers (the AIFM Directive). The
main reason given for the proposed legislation is the alleged susceptibility
of Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMs) to risk and their
ability to undermine the integrity of the European financial markets.
The draft Directive has already invited a lot of criticism from
industry experts and AIFMs for what they see as a knee-jerk reaction
to a financial crisis not precipitated by their activities. Some
industry commentators have argued that the increased levels of supervision
and compliance required under the AIFM Directive threatens to increase
the already onerous reporting requirements placed upon them by the
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and could be detrimental
to the industry due to the added expense it will generate in compliance
and oversight.
The AIFM Directive will apply to fund managers that manage or market
non-UCITS funds with assets under management exceeding €100 million.
There is also provision for managers of unleveraged funds with assets
exceeding €500 million, where investors are the subject of a five-year
lock-in period. Managers of hedge funds, private equity funds, real
estate funds, commodity funds, infrastructure funds and other alternative
institutional funds will all be affected by the Directive.
Authorisation
AIFMs require authorisation from their home member state to operate
within the EU. This will require fund managers to demonstrate that
they are suitably qualified to manage alternative investment funds
(AIFs) and to submit detailed information about planned activities,
details regarding the characteristics of the AIFs under management
and extensive information where it is intended to delegate management
of a fund.
On top of these onerous disclosure requirements, AIFMs will also
be required to provide details of their internal risk management
systems, including how it is intended to deal with the liquidity
and counterparty risks associated with short selling, the fair valuation
of assets and the security of custodial arrangements.
AIFMs will also be required to observe a minimum capital requirement.
Where assets under management are less than €250 million, the fund
manager will need to show a minimum level of capital of €125,000.
Where assets exceed €250 million, the AIFM will be required to boost
the level of its own funds by 0.02% of the excess.
Marketing
AIFMs will be permitted to market to professional investors in
the EU subject to a notification procedure and may 'passport' management
services to another member state. In some limited circumstances,
the fund manager may be permitted to market to retail investors.
Third Country AIFMs
The AIFM Directive makes provision for the marketing of third country
(that is, non-EU) alternative investment funds in the EU. The third
country will need to meet the supervisory and regulatory standards
demonstrated in the EU model and will need to have a cooperative
tax framework in place. The draft directive stipulates that these
provisions will only be possible three years after the directive
has come into force to allow off-shore jurisdictions to improve
their regulatory infrastructures.
Reporting Requirements
Fund managers will need to comply with frequent and detailed reporting
requirements depending on their activities. These will include:
- The percentage of the alternative investment funds assets that
are the subject of special arrangements arising from their illiquid
nature;
- Any new arrangements for managing the liquidity of an AIF;
- The actual risk profile of the AIF and the risk management tools
employed
by the AIFM to manage those risks;
- The main categories of assets in which the AIF invests; and
- The use of short selling during the reporting period.
Where an AIFM manages a leveraged fund or acquires a controlling
interest in a public or private company, extra reporting requirements
will apply. Fund managers will also be required to disclose relevant
information to their investors.
Valuator
The AIFM Directive demands that fund managers appoint an EU-domiciled
valuator to value the assets of any alternative investment funds
under its management where they fall within the scope of the Directive.
The valuator must ensure that the shares and units of the AIF are
valued at least once a year and each time the shares or units of
the fund are issued or redeemed, if this is more frequent.
Implementation
The draft Directive now goes to the European Council and Parliament
for consideration under the co-decision procedure. The Commission
would like to see the directive adopted before the end of 2009 so
as to ensure that member states have implemented the relevant provisions
before the end of 2011. On this timescale, it will be 2014 before
third countries can passport their activities into the EU. There
has already been significant commentary on the effects of the proposed
AIFM Directive. Many within the EU feel that it does not achieve
what it sets out to do in that the detailed reporting requirements
may in fact create a form of regulatory arbitrage that will be exploited
by AIFMs located off-shore and in the United States. In any event,
the coming months are bound to see a period of intense lobbying
in Brussels by those most deeply affected in the industry.
For further information please contact Damien
Barnaville or any member of
our Banking
and Financial Services Group.
© 2003-2009 LK Shields Solicitors.
All rights reserved.
|