|
Here Today, Gone Tomorrow
Employers who have concerns in relation to employees who may
be malingering and availing of 'duvet days' must follow proper
procedures in order to protect themselves from potential unfair
dismissal claims.
Jennifer
Clarke outlines best practice.
Employers who have concerns in relation to approaching an employee
who they feel is malingering or is regularly absent from work without
permission should, in the first place, investigate such absences
promptly and then meet the employee in question for purposes of
finding out the reason why the employee has not attended for work.
The employee should be given the chance to explain those reasons
so that the company can determine any issues that may be contributing
to the employee's absence from work. Where the absence relates to
a medical complaint, the employer should request that the employee
either a) visit their doctor or b) if the complaint is likely to
affect the way the employee does their job, arrange for the employee
to visit the company doctor.
If, after investigating the matter, there appears to be no good
reason for the absence, the company should invoke its disciplinary
procedure and consider issuing a verbal warning to the employee
in question.
In dealing with the issue of long and short-term absences, many
companies are now implementing 'absence management' policies in
an effort to confront absenteeism in the workplace. Such policies
set out processes and procedures for both employees and those within
the company who are responsible for recording and managing absenteeism
and will typically include the following stages:
- initial discussion/counselling interview with the employee;
- verbal warning;
- written warning;
- final written warning/ possible temporary suspension from employment
with or without pay;
- termination of employment.
It is important that the company's disciplinary procedure is set
out in writing and circulated to the whole workforce so that both
management and staff are fully aware of the employer's policy and
procedures in relation to absenteeism.
Such information can also be included in employee's contracts of
employment and the staff manual or employee handbook. It is important
to note that The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) when assessing
whether a dismissal was fair or not will take into consideration
whether such policies and procedures were adhered to.
It is worth noting that there is no legal distinction between valid
absences (say, sickness or family issues) and other absences for
which no valid excuse exists.
When dealing with any form of absence from work, it is vital that
an employer acts in a fair and reasonable manner. The employer must
manage and seek to improve the issue of absenteeism in the workplace
and try to determine how such absences might be dealt with. This
may include, for example, redeploying an employee to a different
job to that which they were initially taken on to do.
Where no genuine reason for an employee's absence exists, the company
should invoke its disciplinary procedure so that the issue can be
dealt with effectively and in accordance with legal requirements.
If a company feels that dismissal is warranted due to a series of
unauthorised absences, it must be able to show that it acted reasonably
and with due regard to fair procedures if it doesn't want to leave
itself open to an unfair dismissal case.
The principles of fair procedures and natural justice include that
the details of the allegations or complaints be put to the employee,
that the employee be given an opportunity to respond fully to such
allegations and that the employee has the right to a fair and impartial
determination of the matters at issue. Also, there must be no pre-judgment
of the matter on the employer's part.
For further information please contact Jennifer
Clarke.
© 2003-2008 LK Shields Solicitors.
All rights reserved.
|