|
Special Resolution Regimes – Are we too
late?
As we know only too well large financial institutions are of "systemic"
importance to any economy. When a large bank fails it has the potential
to infect other banking institutions in an economy and this contagion
can cripple a country and cause political and social upheaval. As
a result of the ongoing financial crisis other jurisdictions, not
least the US and Britain have recognised this and have legislated
for "Special Resolution Regimes" (SRRs) through the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Banking Act 2009
respectively. SRRs are a legislative instrument the IMF have been
advocating for Ireland for some time.
Now, following the finalisation of the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) underpinning the recent stability package agreed between Ireland,
the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund
(IMF), Ireland is indeed obligated to introduce draft SRR legislation
before the end of February 2011.
So what are SRRs and how do they work? More importantly should
Ireland have introduced a SRR already and is it now too late?
Special Resolution Regimes
Put simply, SRRs enable a more orderly resolution of failing banks.
Banks are not like other non-financial institutions. Banks are not
suited to the normal insolvent winding up and bankruptcy procedures
set out in legislation applicable to normal trading companies.
Key to ensuring an effective SRR is the enactment of proper facilitative
legislation. The legislation underpinning an SRR must specifically
contemplate how the banks shareholders, creditors and depositors
are dealt with if a bank fails. Ideally an SRR will be comprised
of a number of elements:
- The minimisation of financial and economic costs (including
the protection
of the supply of credit to the economy);
- Ensuring a minimum level of protection to depositors;
- Does not bail out shareholders; and
- Capable of implementation in a transparent and timely fashion.
The legislation should also contemplate how authorities can intervene
in order to save a bank which, while on the verge of collapse, is
still capable of being recovered should an appropriate purchaser
emerge. This may involve splitting the bank into a good bank and
a bad bank. It may also contain provisions for the creation of a
bridge bank where no purchaser emerges during the resolution process.
The legislation may also contain a level of immunity for the authorities
protecting against prosecution by any party who feels they were
compromised by the process. This is usually provided for on public
policy grounds. The more tools available to the authorities, the
greater the chance of a speedy and orderly resolution of the bank.
The Experience in the UK:
The Banking Act 2009 – Dunfermline Building Society
Britain did not have SRR legislation in place at the time of the
Northern Rock crisis in late 2007. The Banking Act, enacted in February
2009 was the response to the risk of large financial institutions
failing. The legislation created a SRR built upon the tripartite
authority of the Bank of England, HM Treasury and the Financial
Services Authority (the FSA).
The SRR gives these authorities the power to:
- Transfer all or part of a failing bank to a private sector purchaser;
- Transfer all or part of a failing bank to a bridge bank, a subsidiary
of the
Bank of England, pending a future sale;
- Place a bank into temporary public ownership (HM Treasury's
decision);
- Apply to put a bank into the Bank Insolvency Procedure which
is designed to
allow for rapid payments to the Financial Services Compensation
Scheme
insured depositors; and
- Apply for the use of the Bank Administration Procedure to deal
with a part of
a bank that is not transferred and is instead put into administration.
Not long after its introduction the SRR was called into action.
On the 28 March 2009 the FSA issued a statement that Dunfermline
Building Society (DBS) was likely to fail to meet the FSA's threshold
conditions for authorisation.
Over the weekend that followed the various powers available under
the legislation were used to transfer much of assets and liabilities
of DBS to Nationwide Building Society. Any assets and liabilities
remaining were transferred to a bridge bank and this was then placed
into special administration - a process to administer the run-off
and potential sale of the remaining assets. On the 30 March 2009
the Bank of England issued a press release confirming that it was
business as usual for the customers of DBS.
The Irish Position
In its report Ireland 2010 Article IV Consultation published
in July 2010, the IMF noted that Ireland should "take early action
to introduce a special resolution mechanism ... to meet contingencies
and strengthen the stability framework". The Irish government is
now under an obligation to reform the banking sector following the
recent MOU entered into with the ECB and the IMF. Under the terms
of the MOU the Irish government must present draft legislation before
the Dail by the end of February 2011 to facilitate the introduction
of a SRR.
With the effective nationalisation of the largest Irish banking
institutions an SRR might well be regarded as locking the gate after
the Celtic Tiger has bolted. Had the process been in place at the
outset of the banking crisis in 2008 it is very possible that an
institution such as Anglo Irish Bank could have been resolved far
more efficiently and without the enormous expense which ultimately
resulted to the Irish taxpayer.
While it may seem toothless now, an SRR is one pillar of effective
banking regulation that modern, developed economies must have in
place. The ECB and the IMF have recognised this. Patrick Honohan
recently made a speech to the Institute of Chartered Accountants
in Ireland whereby he stated that the Irish banks were for sale.
While there may not be too many willing buyers currently in the
market we must plan now for a scenario where privately owned banks
of systemic importance require an effective resolution process.
Conclusion
It will be interesting to see how the proposed SRR legislation
will deal with the transfer of the property and shares of large
financial institutions. The section in the MOU dealing with the
SRR also notes that the Irish legislature will need to ensure the
legislation is "consistent with similar initiatives going on at
EU Level". This would appear to be a reference to recent developments
in the EU regarding the resolution of crisis where cross-border
financial institutions are at risk of failing. In any event the
next few months will be full of interesting developments in this
area.
For further information please contact Damien
Barnaville.
December 2010.
© 2003-2010 LK Shields Solicitors.
All rights reserved.
|